|
by Joel Aufrecht
07:53 PM, 04 Apr 2003
Greenspan's latest speech is taken as evidence that he wants to reform patent protections. But his fundamental premise is wrong:
In the case of physical property, we take it for granted that the ownership right should have the potential of persisting as long as the physical object itself. In the case of an idea, however, we have chosen to strike a different balance in recognition of the chaos that could follow from having to trace back all the thoughts implicit in one's current undertaking and pay a royalty to the originator of each one. So rather than adopting that obviously principled but unworkable approach, we have chosen instead to follow the lead of British common law and place time limits on intellectual property rights.No, no, no. Greenspan implies that, in principle, intellectual property rights should last forever just like physical property rights. And that the only reason they don't is that that would be to inconvenient to enforce. What about the concept that right derive from their benefit to humanity? By creating unnecessary scarcity, intellectual property rights hurt humanity. You can also read his speech in plain English.
Categories:
Comments (0)
by Joel Aufrecht
06:33 PM, 04 Apr 2003
DUHOK, Iraqi Kurdistan Well, that last post was quite a cliff-hanger, wasnt it? However, after two nights and a day of walking well, walking, marching, climbing, scrambling from Turkey to Iraq, I can confirm that Im safe and well in Duhok at the Jiyan Palace Hotel. The crossing was a Bataan death march. Luckily we survived. Im exhausted. Its 4 p.m. here in Iraq, and I need to sleep for a while. Sorry for no details on this one, but Im just absolutely knackered.I'm now reading the weblogs of two different independent journalists in Northern Iraq, Christopher Allbritton, quoted above, and Phillip Robertson, reporting for Salon. What's weird is that Robertson keeps mentioning camera crews and reporters all over the place in Northern Iraq. Who are they? Where are their weblogs?
Categories:
Comments (0)
by Joel Aufrecht
06:14 PM, 04 Apr 2003
Retired General Anthony Zinni, former CinC of the Central Command and recently "retired" from being Bush's middle east envoy, is the most generally credible military viewpoint I've seen.
"You don't speak to Arab pride and Arab manhood in this way. That whole psychological business gave them another cause to fight for, more than they would have fought just for Saddam."
Categories:
Comments (0)
|
Joel's Blog CategoriesChina (2 items)Denmark (22) Danish (11) Commentary (57) Quotation (130) War (24) Singapore (223) Public Finance (21) Institutional Analysis (15) Brain (5) Managing the Public Sector (15) Global Issues and Institutions (20) Non-State Actors in Governance (17) Leadership and Dynamics of Communication (12) Good News (97) Reviews (51) Baseball (30) Policy Analysis and Programme Evaluation (10) Urban Transport Policy (1) Archive
October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 April 2001 NotificationsYou may request notification for Joel's Blog. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||