by Joel Aufrecht 11:29 AM, 05 Jan 2006
An article in Physics Today goes into excruciating detail on car crash physics and economics.
In response to the possibility that fuel-economy regulations might be strengthened, safety experts of major US manufacturers, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the Insurance Institute of Highway Safety, and a 2001 study at the National Research Council have concluded that light vehicles are fundamentally less safe than heavy vehicles. ... However, attributing the safety records of today’s vehicles primarily to their masses is misleading. The average heavier vehicle tends to be more protective of its occupants also because of its size, higher general quality, and the incorporation of more recent safety features. ... We have found that among cars, risk correlates much more strongly with the blue-book price of the used car than with its mass.
When two cars hit, the kinetic energy must be dissipated. How it's dissipated determines who lives and who dies:
Robert Zobel, head of accident research at Volkswagen, has analyzed the safety of front-to-front crashes of car models that have “passed” the standard frontal crash test ... two cars could, in principle, safely dissipate their combined kinetic energy if their closing speed is less than 70 mph, independent of their masses.

But there are two important caveats. First, if one car’s front is unnecessarily stiff, the other car may have to absorb so much of the energy that its passenger compartment is compromised. Second, if the fronts of the colliding cars are not sufficiently similar and homogeneous to assure so-called structural interaction in a head-on crash, there may be penetration into the passenger compartment. ... The disparity in height, stiffness, and mass between light trucks and passenger cars is a major safety issue. On a pickup or SUV, the height and localized stiffness of its front is particularly hazardous for others. The typical pickup truck chassis shown in figure 7 has two horizontal “rails” that are high and extend far to the front. Pickups and body-on-frame SUVs impose high risks on occupants of other vehicles.

Drive a truck, make other people pay for your mistakes. But not only do trucks and SUVs externalize the risk of bad driving, they also increase the total risk:
... we have estimated that replacing with passenger cars all the light trucks in the US that are used only as “car substitutes” would save three to four thousand lives a year.
Categories: Comments (0)
XML

Archive

January 2006
S M T W T F S
4  5  6 
8  10  11  12  13  14 
15  16  17  18  19  20  21 
22  23  24  25  26  27  28 
29  30  31         
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
April 2001

Notifications

You may request notification for Joel's Blog.

Syndication Feed

XML

Recent Comments

  1. Victor Koledoye: A Religion ticket
  2. Joel Aufrecht: from a senior roboticist
  3. Jeff Davis: Source?
  4. Kathryn Schild: quick question
  5. Tai Yan Lim: Trip Back Home - Joel
  6. José Rodrigues: Hello
  7. Guan Yang:
  8. Erika Graffunder: Canada
  9. Erika Graffunder: Per capita emissions
  10. Erika Graffunder: Policy - should you keep evaluating or focus on solutions