by Joel Aufrecht 11:48 AM, 20 Jan 2006
"Republican strategist Ed Rogers," talking to Chris Matthews on NBC, tries to deflect and minimize the Abramoff scandal's impact:
MATTHEWS: The White House put out the statement yesterday that the White House staffers had been meeting with Jack Abramoff. And I just think that's worthy of further discussion.

ROGERS: Is it worthy of discussion whatever Democrats met with Jack Abramoff or met with a Jack Abramoff employee?

[...]

ROGERS: Sure. Look, this is going to come out. Nobody is going to keep it a secret. Jack Abramoff is so radioactive—I've got Jack Abramoff fatigue already. I mean, good grief, he didn't kill anybody. Maybe that one guy in Florida.

MATTHEWS: The perfect time to get that fatigue, as the smell heads towards the White House.

Wait, wait, go back a second, what was that about that one guy in Florida? Do you mean Gus Boulis? The guy whose alleged murders were paid $95,000 by Abramoff's business partner Adam Kidan? You think maybe Abramoff killed him? Or are you just joking about an on-going murder investigation one or two steps away from Abramoff, who was one step away from Bush? Notice also the aggressive, hardball followup from biased liberal media hack Chris Matthews.
Categories: Comments (0)
by Joel Aufrecht 09:44 AM, 20 Jan 2006
The law of unintended consequences states that changes to complex systems will produce results other than those intended. Forest fire prevention in the United States in the 20th century is a classic example; by aiming for total fire suppression, firefighters left huge amounts of flammable material in the forest, and when fires did break through the suppression, they were far more powerful and destructive. Essentially, the forest ecosystem had evolved to anticipate and depend on forest fires, and taking away the regular fires disrupted the system.

It occurred to me that meteorite impact prevention is going down the same path. We are on the verge of gaining the ability to identify and intercept asteroids that would otherwise hit Earth to tremendous effect. Is there any possibility that Earth ecosystems in some way anticipate or depend on meteor impact catastrophies?

Categories: Comments (1)
XML

Archive

January 2006
S M T W T F S
4  5  6 
8  10  11  12  13  14 
15  16  17  18  19  20  21 
22  23  24  25  26  27  28 
29  30  31         
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
April 2001

Notifications

You may request notification for Joel's Blog.

Syndication Feed

XML

Recent Comments

  1. Victor Koledoye: A Religion ticket
  2. Joel Aufrecht: from a senior roboticist
  3. Jeff Davis: Source?
  4. Kathryn Schild: quick question
  5. Tai Yan Lim: Trip Back Home - Joel
  6. José Rodrigues: Hello
  7. Guan Yang:
  8. Erika Graffunder: Canada
  9. Erika Graffunder: Per capita emissions
  10. Erika Graffunder: Policy - should you keep evaluating or focus on solutions